http://www.perrygarvin.com/blog/2006/03/10/the-armory-show-review-art-new-york-times/ Links, artwork, and editorial by Perry Garvin Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:34:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.perrygarvin.com/blog/2006/03/10/the-armory-show-review-art-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-5433 steven paul riddle Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:19:18 +0000 http://www.perrygarvin.net/blog/?p=30#comment-5433 the armory show, while not a waste, was not the avant-guard of the art world. i was suprised not to have been stunned by new and vibrant, at least eclectic, works when my wife and i vistited yesterday. galleries do not appear to not looking for innovative and well executed art but what sells, not even finding that. anyway nothing of note, and nothing eye-popping or notable. of course at the modern portion of the armory show there were some pieces of interest. the comtempory had no sizzle whatsoever; after all this is the armory the armory show, while not a waste, was not the avant-guard of the art world. i was suprised not to have been stunned by new and vibrant, at least eclectic, works when my wife and i vistited yesterday. galleries do not appear to not looking for innovative and well executed art but what sells, not even finding that. anyway nothing of note, and nothing eye-popping or notable. of course at the modern portion of the armory show there were some pieces of interest. the comtempory had no sizzle whatsoever; after all this is the armory

]]> http://www.perrygarvin.com/blog/2006/03/10/the-armory-show-review-art-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-38 Holly Crawford Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:13:46 +0000 http://www.perrygarvin.net/blog/?p=30#comment-38 It is now edited. And Yuko Ono it is not. Holly Crawford It is now edited. And Yuko Ono it is not. Holly Crawford

]]> http://www.perrygarvin.com/blog/2006/03/10/the-armory-show-review-art-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-37 Lisa Hunter Sun, 09 Apr 2006 20:33:23 +0000 http://www.perrygarvin.net/blog/?p=30#comment-37 Maybe they mean "critical" in a different sense of the word, i.e. "Can you believe that derivative junk? Yoko Ono was doing the same thing, and better, back in the 1970s. And what's with that artist's outfit -- she looked like Chloe Sevigny got dressed in the dark..." :-) Maybe they mean “critical” in a different sense of the word, i.e. “Can you believe that derivative junk? Yoko Ono was doing the same thing, and better, back in the 1970s. And what’s with that artist’s outfit — she looked like Chloe Sevigny got dressed in the dark…” :-)

]]>