Comments on: SFMOMA Website Redesign

By: EH

EH — Thu, 02 Sep 2010 06:52:39 +0000

It just looks incomplete because they devoted most of their time and expertise to inventing “E.news”.

By: Whitney Website Redesign | Plog

Whitney Website Redesign | Plog — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:09:04 +0000

[...] of the Whitney’s caliber relaunch their websites including the Hammer Museum, Guggenheim, MoMA, SFMOMA, and Museum of Art and Design. These organizations produced polished, professional sites to serve [...]

By: Kate

Kate — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:38:29 +0000

drop by, nice blog.

By: Matt Morgan

Matt Morgan — Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:49:42 +0000

Perry, in general I agree with this review. But one statement I think is poorly founded:

” … since the average site visitor will give you about 1 minute of their precious time, you better offer as many visuals as possible in the hopes of stimulating a longer visit.”

On the Met’s website the average visit is about seven minutes, so the first part of the statement is wrong, at least in many cases. And I don’t know of evidence supporting the second part of the statement (ie, that visuals influence length of visit in an effective way–maybe you can slow people down with a flash intro, but you can’t get them more information in less time). Do you?

Thanks,
Matt

By: david

david — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:15:05 +0000

this is what at least 2 years of pre-build research (and probably an ungodly amount of money) gets you??! i could have shared a little gem called “add RSS feeds asap” for the cost of a cup of coffee. i hope the backend sings.